Statistics generated on Friday 9 January 2026 - 0:04:14
During this 7-day reporting period, a total of 3 different nicks were represented on #apertium.
|
| 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.2% |
0% | 13.0% |
4.3% |
2.2% |
4.3% |
0% | 6.5% |
2.2% |
0% | 2.2% |
17.4% |
13.0% |
0% | 15.2% |
10.9% |
2.2% |
4.3% |
0% | 0% |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
|
| Nick | Number of lines | When? | Number of Words | Last seen | Random quote | |
| 1 | dangswan | 5 | 84 | 2 days ago | "so far the 100x larger bidix has actually made things worse so..." | |
| 2 | TinoDidriksen | 3 | 7 | 2 days ago | "Yeah, -quality is ancient." | |
| 3 | Dominic_ | 1 | 15 | 2 days ago | "Hola. "Predisposed" debe traducir como "predispuesto", pero es..." |
|
| Nobody asked questions here; just geniuses in this channel? |
| Nobody shouted at all, wow. |
| Everybody had their shift-key under control. :) |
| Nobody beat anyone up. Everybody was friendly. |
| Nobody smiles in #apertium! Cheer up guys and girls. |
| Nobody is sad in #apertium! What a happy channel. :-) |
| dangswan wrote the longest lines, averaging 91.8 letters per line. #apertium average was 67.9 letters per line. |
| TinoDidriksen wrote the shortest lines, averaging 14.3 characters per line. dangswan was tight-lipped, too, averaging 91.8 characters. |
| dangswan spoke a total of 84 words!
dangswan's faithful follower, Dominic_, didn't speak so much: 15 words. |
| dangswan wrote an average of 16.80 words per line.
Channel average was 11.78 words per line. |
|
| Nice opers here, no one got kicked! |
| Strange, no op was given on #apertium! |
| Wow, no op was taken on #apertium! |
| dangswan always lets us know what he/she's doing: 2 actions! For example, like this: * dangswan checks who maintains apertium-quality |
| Nobody is foul-mouthed in #apertium! Get out much? |
|
| A topic was never set on this channel. |