Comments on: C++ Map Speeds, MSVC++ Edition http://tinodidriksen.com/2009/10/04/cpp-map-speeds-msvc-edition/ The words and ideas of Tino Didriksen Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:44:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Tino Didriksen http://tinodidriksen.com/2009/10/04/cpp-map-speeds-msvc-edition/#comment-7724 Tino Didriksen Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:48:16 +0000 http://tinodidriksen.com/?p=137#comment-7724 Was discussed on IRC ( irc://irc.quakenet.org/c%2b%2b ). Turns out Boost 1.38 was slower due to a serious regression when handling big containers. 1.39 and onwards ( http://www.boostpro.com/download ) are nice and smooth. Was discussed on IRC ( irc://irc.quakenet.org/c%2b%2b ). Turns out Boost 1.38 was slower due to a serious regression when handling big containers. 1.39 and onwards ( http://www.boostpro.com/download ) are nice and smooth.

]]> By: Mr_Dark http://tinodidriksen.com/2009/10/04/cpp-map-speeds-msvc-edition/#comment-7723 Mr_Dark Sun, 20 Dec 2009 15:25:38 +0000 http://tinodidriksen.com/?p=137#comment-7723 I made a small bench for myself, but I have the opposite results from what you have (std::map vs boost:unordered_map). In my bench the std::map is much faster. Code can be found here: http://pastebin.com/m3cd74f51 So I'd like to know what I'm doing wrong here :P I made a small bench for myself, but I have the opposite results from what you have (std::map vs boost:unordered_map). In my bench the std::map is much faster.

Code can be found here:
http://pastebin.com/m3cd74f51

So I’d like to know what I’m doing wrong here :P

]]>